How Energy-Audit.eu develops technical content

Technical content follows implemented logic

Public methodology, FAQ answers and assessment-page explanations should reflect calculations and inputs that are implemented in the application. Where a calculation uses defaults or simplified assumptions, the public explanation should identify that scope rather than imply a site measurement or detailed design analysis.

Assumptions and limits are part of the explanation

Technical content should distinguish preliminary comparison from professional design, statutory certification, site inspection and detailed moisture analysis. It should state when results depend on entered data, geometry, material properties, climate, occupancy, controls, air change or other model assumptions.

Marketing wording must not override those limitations. Claims of guaranteed savings, compliance, certification, on-site verification or official status are not appropriate unless the underlying service demonstrably provides them.

When product logic changes

When relevant inputs, calculation logic or report outputs change, the related methodology and public explanatory content should be reviewed and revised. This includes the scope of heat-loss estimates, ventilation assumptions, renovation comparisons and condensation-related indicators.

Visible content and structured data

Structured data should describe content that users can read on the page. FAQ structured data uses the same question-and-answer content shown to visitors, and route metadata should identify the actual page rather than the homepage.

Review the methodology

Read the documented inputs, equations and limitations behind the preliminary assessment.